Brown additive(c.1918–c.1930)
An obscure film format and additive color process, with two parallel columns of images, each dyed a complementary color.
Film Explorer
A 35mm print featuring dual columns of simultaneously exposed frames, tinted in complementary colors – one side red, the other green.
Film Frame Collection (P-074), Seaver Center for Western History Research, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
35mm print. The images on each column were captured using red and green filters onto a panchromatic B/W emulsion.
Film Frame Collection (P-074), Seaver Center for Western History Research, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
A surviving work element. According to his patents, Lloyd Brown’s process could be interchangeably used for B/W, or color films.
Film Frame Collection (P-074), Seaver Center for Western History Research, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Unidentified footage with two columns of images on 35mm film, with a non-standard central perforation arrangement. Different tonal variation, in the B/W images in each column, indicate this is probably color footage, although the frames are not dyed red and green, as in other surviving samples.
George Eastman Museum, Rochester, NY, United States.
According to Brown’s patent, a standard 35mm negative could be used, with alternating frames used for capturing red and green records onto a panchromatic B/W emulsion. The images were reduced in size and printed in two columns on the print.
Design by Christian Zavanaiu.
Identification
Approximately 16.82mm x 12.12 mm (0.662 in x 0.477 in).
Approx.
Single central perforation.
B/W
Unknown. There appears to be none, based on the surviving samples.
1
Little is known. Most of the surviving 35mm print samples are tinted. Presumably, the two color records would have been combined during projection to create a natural color image.
Unknown
Unknown
B/W, presumably panchromatized to be sensitive to the full spectrum of light.
Unknown
History
[Film Atlas: Little is currently known about this obscure process outside of the surviving film frames preserved at the Seaver Center for Western History Research (Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County), and the few sources listed in the References section. We welcome any leads readers may be able to provide.]
Based on the patents found, and as mentioned on the cataloging index card accompanying the surviving samples preserved at the Seaver Center for Western History Research (Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County), this color process was likely invented by Lloyd Brown around 1918 and further developed until approximately 1930.
Lloyd Brown, according to the contemporary press, was a showman-exhibitor, producer, general manager of W. H. Clune’s many enterprises, and known in the industry as an expert in lighting. He filed three patents (in 1918, 1920 and 1922) that are believed to be related to the surviving film frames. In those, Brown described his process as having two main advantages: to allow more-efficient use of 35mm film stock, by reducing frames and rearranging them in two columns; and to improve the projection of color films, with the combining of the two color records happening on-screen simultaneously, without the need for alternately projected, dyed or filtered frames, thus removing color flicker. It is not known if the process produced successful results, or was developed past the test stage.
Technology
"[Little is currently known about this obscure process outside of the surviving film frames preserved at the Seaver Center for Western History Research (Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County), and the few sources listed in the References section. We welcome any leads readers may be able to provide.]"
Lloyd Brown’s invention relied on a reconfiguration of the size and position of frames onto 35mm film, which according to his patents, was intended for the reproduction of both B/W and color films. The patent describes that color images could be recorded on a regular 35mm B/W negative, capturing the same frame simultaneously in two colors (red and green), one above the other. The possibility of dividing the film in two, vertically, and pre-treating each side respectively with a red- or green-light sensitive emulsion was also mentioned, although this solution sounds unlikely from a practical point of view – the color records were most likely captured onto panchromatic film, through filters.
On the print, the same frames were arranged in two parallel columns, one dyed red, the other green, and consecutive frames were positioned vertically, as on regular 35mm. The space traditionally allocated for one regular frame on 35mm would thus contain four smaller images. As seen on the frame samples, the film was likely advanced through the central perforation, positioned at the intersection of two consecutive frames and two parallel color columns. While the surviving samples from the Seaver Center for Western History Research showcase that the prints were tinted (Brown mentioned preferring dye baths to color his prints), the index card accompanying them misleadingly refers to “color being produced by a revolving red and blue-green filter in front of the projector”.
Index card accompanying the surviving frames. It is likely the samples were donated by Irving Millard, working at the Consolidated Film Industries (CFI) laboratory in Hollywood, CA. It is unclear if CFI and Millard were directly connected to this process.
Film Frame Collection (P-074), Seaver Center for Western History Research, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Patent filed by Brown in 1922. Fig. 13 corresponds to Brown’s 35mm negative with alternating red and green color records capturing on a B/W emulsion, and Fig 14 shows the resulting positive, in the case of color films. Fig. 14 is believed to correspond to the surviving frames.
Brown, Lloyd. Printer and Process of Printing Photographic Films. US Patent US1721202, filed September 13, 1992, and issued July 16, 1929. https://patents.google.com/patent/US1721202
Patent filed by Lloyd Brown in 1920. This earlier version of the process showcases an alternate frame arrangement with two parallel columns present on a regular 35mm negative.
Brown, Lloyd. Motion-Picture Mechanism. US Patent US1514501, filed May 13, 1920 , and issued November 4, 1924. https://patents.google.com/patent/US1514501
References
International Photographer (1929). “Hollywood’s First Color Camera”. The International Photographer, 1:7 (Aug. 19): p. 29.
Motion Picture News (1915). “West Coast Exhibitor Buys Fiction Pictures Studio”. Motion Picture News, 12:1 (Jul. 10): p. 42.
Moving Picture World (1915). “A Los Angeles Exhibitor”. The Moving Picture World, 24:1 (Apr. 3): p. 705.
Patents
Brown, Lloyd. Motion Picture Kinetograph and Method of Exposing Films. US Patent US1344616, filed December 16, 1918 , and issued June 29, 1920. https://patents.google.com/patent/US1344616A/
Brown, Lloyd. Motion-Picture Mechanism. US Patent US1514501, filed May 13, 1920, and issued November 4, 1924. https://patents.google.com/patent/US1514501
Brown, Lloyd. Printer and Process of Printing Photographic Films. US Patent US1721202, filed September 13, 1992, and issued July 16, 1929. https://patents.google.com/patent/US1721202
Compare
Related entries
Author
Margaux Chalançon is an independent audiovisual archivist. A graduate of the Film Preservation Master’s program at Elías Querejeta Zine Eskola (EQZE), Donostia-San Sebastian, she carried out the restoration of The Freedom Giver (Kais al Zubaidi, 1989). She currently works as production associate on the Film Atlas project and as an audiovisual archivist with Les Films de Mon Oncle, preserving the works of Jacques Tati. https://www.margaux-ch.com/
Chalançon, Margaux (2025). “Brown additive”. In James Layton (ed.), Film Atlas. www.filmatlas.com. Brussels: International Federation of Film Archives / Rochester, NY: George Eastman Museum.

